Improved median PFS for patients with late-stage non-squamous NSCLC treated with first-line sintilimab plus conventional chemotherapy regime
Orient-11 evaluated the efficacy and safety of the addition of sintilimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, to conventional chemotherapy combination of platinum and pemetrexed as first-line therapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq NSCLC). The trial was conducted in China, and the inclusion criteria were the diagnosis of untreated locally advanced or metastatic, Stage IIIB/C or IV nsq NSCLC with ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and absence of sensitive EGFR or ALK genetic rearrangements.
In total, 397 patients were randomized in a 2-to-1-ratio to receive treatment with either sintilimab or placebo in combination with chemotherapy of pemetrexed and platinum (either cisplatin or carboplatin) every three weeks for four cycles, followed by maintenance treatment with pemetrexed plus either sintilimab or placebo for up to 24 months. Importantly, patients in the placebo group could crossover within the study, to maintenance treatment with sintilimab monotherapy after central confirmation of progression, for up to 24 months. Patients were stratified based on gender, type of platinum agent and PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score (TPS) <1% vs ≥1%).
Baseline characteristics of patients in both treatments were similar with a higher proportion of patients being male (~75%), with Stage IV disease (~90%) and on carboplatin regimen (~75%). Interestingly, this trial had a higher percentage of never smokers in both treatment groups (~35%) compared to earlier studies in similar indications.
The primary endpoint of the trial was met, with median progression-free survival (mPFS) assessed by an independent radiologic review committee (IRRC) improved to 8.9 months in the sintilimab group as compared to 5 months in the placebo group (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Median PFS assessed by IRRC as the primary endpoint for the ORIENT-11 study
The mPFS improvement was consistent across all patient subgroups, and especially in the subgroup expressing ≥50% PD-L1 TPS with mPFS not reached until the analysis (Figure 2). The patients in the other two PD-L1 TPS subgroups also showed improvement in their mPFS, though to a lesser extent of around two months, with mPFS for TPS <1% at 7.3 months and TPS 1-49% at 7.1 months for the sintilimab treatment group (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Median PFS in patient subgroups based on PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS)
The addition of sintilimab to chemotherapy demonstrated improvements in secondary efficacy endpoints as well. Overall survival (OS) data was not yet fully mature, with medians not reached at the time of data cut-off for either treatment arms, but showing a positive trend for sintilimab and chemotherapy combination regimen (6-month overall survival: 89.6% vs 80.4%, HR 0.609, 95% CI 0.400 – 0.926; p = 0.01921) with the median follow-up of 8.9 months. The combination arm also yielded a higher objective response rate (51.9% vs 29.8%), longer duration of response (not reached vs 5.5 months) and shorter time to response (1.5 vs 2.6 months) as compared to the placebo arm.
The overall safety profiles of both treatment groups were similar with anemia, neutropenia and leukopenia being the most common adverse events reported; the typical toxicity profile of pemetrexed plus platinum regimen. The proportion of immune-related AEs (irAEs) was predominantly higher in the treatment group with sintilimab as compared to the placebo group (43.25% vs 36.6%) with an increased incidence of hypothyroidism, rash, and immune-mediated pneumonitis. These increased irAEs were mostly low grade with incidences of high-grade irAEs (3-5) similar between the two groups (5.6% vs 6.1%).
In conclusion, the interim analysis of Orient-11 trial met its primary endpoint, and the data appears comparable to other chemoimmunotherapy studies, including KEYNOTE-189, which studied the addition of pembrolizumab to platinum plus pemetrexed regimen. Keeping in mind the caveats associated with cross-trial comparisons, longer follow-up from Orient-11 will be required to compare OS data between the trials.
More posts
Nivolumab as a new option in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma
Until recently, no randomized phase III trials have demonstrated OS improvement in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma. PD-1 inhibition with single-agent nivolumab has shown activity in three phase II studies, one of which led to the approval of nivolumab in Japan.
Interview: Lung cancer screening: hurdles in daily routine and in the research laboratory
All of us agree that LDCT is effective and should be widely implemented. I would say that cost and awareness are the two major issues that are impeding the implementation of LDCT all over the world. Cost-effectiveness of LDCT has been demonstrated by many publications; and there are even other arguments in favor of the cost-effectiveness of this technology.
Immunotherapy: combination regimens and new data on the significance of mutations
Substantial OS and PFS improvements have led to the implementation of the regimen evaluated in the KEYNOTE-189 trial as standard first-line approach for stage IV non-squamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations.
What is new in SCLC?
A novel approach for targeting lung tumors with small-cell histology consists in the inhibition of transactivated transcription, as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been found to be a transcription-addicted malignancy. Rudin et al. defined four molecular SCLC subtypes according to their differential expression of four key transcription regulators.
Interview: Antibody-drug conjugates: the age of almost unlimited possibilities has just begun
Antibody-drug conjugates have opened up an entirely new paradigm. Targeted therapy requires specific mutations, and immunotherapy only works if the tumor expresses neoantigens or is essentially able to respond to these agents. As we know, these two approaches do not work forever, not every patient responds to them, and certainly not every patient has a targetable mutation.
Specific treatment approaches in the EGFR-mutated setting
EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations are found in approximately 5 % to 12 % of EGFR-mutated NSCLC tumors, i.e., in 2 % of all NSCLC cases. They represent the third most common EGFR mutation after L858R and exon 19 deletion. However, EGFR TKIs cannot be used to treat lung cancer with exon 20 insertions as they are insensitive to these drugs due to steric hindrance at the TKI-binding site.