Preface – ESMO 2017

David R. Gandara, MD Professor of Medicine UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Sacramento, California, USA

David R. Gandara, MD Professor of Medicine UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center Sacramento, California, USA

Dear Colleagues,

Remarkable data in the field of lung cancer with potentially practice-changing impact have been presented at this year’s ESMO Congress that took place in Madrid, Spain, from 8th to 12th September, 2017. Immunotherapeutic approaches again constituted a major topic, as clinical researchers are tirelessly exploring the multitude of conditions and limitations determining the optimal use of these drugs.
This issue of memo inOncology delineates analyses of the OAK and POPLAR trials that confirmed the activity of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab regardless of PD-L1 expression and showed that assessment of tumour mutational burden in patient blood is feasible and correlates with treatment benefits. The PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab excelled in the PACIFIC trial in patients with stage III lung cancer, thus providing an answer to a significant unmet need. Further analyses related to the ­activity of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in the elderly and the optimal treatment duration with nivolumab.
Likewise, immunostimulation with the toll-like receptor 9 agonist lefitolimod is a promising approach in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. Another indication suitable for the use of immunotherapeutic agents appears to be mesothelioma, which is known to confer poor prognosis. Several analyses presented at the ESMO 2017 Congress suggested clinically meaningful benefits of various immunotherapeutic agents in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
In the area of targeted therapies, the debate on sequencing of drugs is gaining momentum, as head-to-head comparisons have shown superiority of potent later-generation drugs over established first-line compounds. This is true for the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib, which outperformed gefitinib and erlotinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer, as well as for the ALK inhibitor alectinib that gave rise to improvements in progression-free survival and central nervous system outcomes when compared to crizotinib in the ALK-positive setting. The optimal succession of agents across several treatment lines, which is crucial for the achievement of the maximum survival benefit, still needs to be determined.
Last but not least, progress has been made with regard to targeted approaches that are under investigation for patients with rare driver mutations such as BRAF. When administered in a combined fashion, the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK inhibitor trametinib showed substantial anti-tumour activity as a first-line strategy in BRAF-positive lung cancer patients.

More posts

ALK-positive NSCLC: updates on crizotinib and alectinib

PROFILE 1014 was the first study to define the role of the ALK inhibitor crizotinib in the first-line treatment of patients with ALK-positive lung cancer. It compared crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 172) with pemetrexed plus cisplatin (n = 171) in patients with ALK-positive, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC in the first-line setting.

Characteristics and outcomes for SCLC arising from transformation

A low but significant proportion of EGFR-mutant adenocarcinomas transforms to SCLC at the time of acquisition of resistance to EGFR TKI therapy. Moreover, cases of de novo SCLC harbouring EGFR mutations have been reported. As the clinical characteristics and clinical course of SCLC-transformed EGFR-mutant lung cancer are largely unknown, Marcoux et al. retrospectively reviewed the records of 16 patients with EGFR-mutant SCLC treated between 2006 and 2017.

Reaching unprecedented outcome dimensions in malignant mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. While combination chemotherapy with platinum and pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab is a standard in first-line treatment, no approved second-line strategies have been established to date. Gemcitabine or vinorelbine are often used in this situation, but these only show limited activity.

Interview: “Survival is the result of multiple treatment lines”

FLAURA is a positive trial, as its results favour osimertinib over gefitinib and erlotinib. Now we have to consider this among the multiple options that are available for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Besides osimertinib, there are the first-generation TKIs erlotinib and gefitinib and the se­cond-generation TKI afatinib, but maybe sometime soon also dacomitinib, for which data were presented at the last ASCO Meeting.

EGFR-mutant lung cancer: sequencing as a major topic in light of new data

The first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) erlotinib and gefitinib as well as the second-generation EGFR TKI afatinib are the recommended first-line options for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Regardless of the extent of initial response, however, more than 60 % of patients develop the T790M resistance mutation.

Randomised findings on CT-based follow-up after resection of early NSCLC

Regarding the optimal follow-up after surgery for early-stage NSCLC, the ESMO guidelines recommend patient surveillance every six months for 2-3 years with visits including history, physical examination and preferably contrast-enhanced spiral chest CT at 12 and 24 months. Thereafter, annual visits including history, physical examination and chest CT should be performed to detect second primary tumours (SPCs).