Bone marrow microenvironment: culprit and target

Jorge J. Castillo, MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, USA

Jorge J. Castillo, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA

Apart from factors such as genetic events that contribute to the malignant transformation in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia (WM), the bone marrow microenvironment has been identified as a crucial player in WM disease progression [1]. Similarly, it appears to be essential for the emergence and ­progression of multiple myeloma (MM) and constitutes a significant reason why MM ­patients are not amenable to cure but inevitably develop relapses [2]. Delineation of malignant cell growth in the context of the bone marrow microenvironment has therefore moved into the focus of research approximately 15 years ago as it might enable the design of more efficient therapeutic strategies for both MM and WM.

According to our understanding, immuno­modulatory agents such as thalidomide and lenalidomide that are being used to treat MM patients exert effects by modifying the microenvironment. Likewise, I believe that ibrutinib, when used in patients with WM, not only works by inhibiting BTK, which is an important aspect, but also regulates the microenvironment to some degree. Observations we make in clinical routine support this assumption. For example, we would treat a patient with WM and 80 % infiltration of the bone marrow who is very anemic because the marrow does not provide sufficient space to produce an appropriate quantity of red cells. Three to 6 months into therapy, the patient’s hemoglobin is back to normal or much improved, and the IgM levels have decreased by 50 % or 70 %. However, when we perform another bone marrow biopsy on this patient, we find that the degree of infiltration is still 80 %. Therefore, we believe that a mechanism within the ­malignant cell uses the microenvironment to achieve a survival advantage. I feel that ibrutinib and many other medications work by suppressing the disease’s impact on the microenvironment.

Much research is going on concerning the possibility of targeting the disease by targeting the microenvironment. From my perspective, this specific approach has been more successful in MM than it has been in WM, but I believe that we are on our way to identifying agents that can potentially help in this scenario. Hopefully, we can combine these with BTK inhibitors, Bcl-2 inhibitors and other agents to achieve more profound and long-lasting responses.

REFERENCES

  1. Jalali S, Ansell SM, Bone marrow microenvironment in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2016; 29(2): 148-155
  2. Mondello P et al., Bone marrow microenvironment is a crucial player for myelomagenesis and disease progression. Oncotarget 2017; 8(12): 20394-20409

More posts

PD-1 inhibition and (Non-)Hodgkin lymphoma: promising outcomes in an emerging field

Mediastinal gray zone lymphoma (MGZL) is an extremely rare type of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma with a predominance in young men. This disease exhibits transitional features between nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL). However, compared to PMBL, survival of patients with MGZL is inferior after conventional chemotherapy.

Finding the way among a multitude of targets and regimens

I would like to address two factors here. The first one relates to favorable disease biology. Patients who have mutated immunoglobulin genes or lack TP53 mutations or 17p loss are more likely to experience treatment-free remission. The other main factor is treatment capable of inducing deep remission, which is usually combination therapy. Historically, the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab regimen was the gold standard with which patients could achieve deep remissions.

Advancing treatment in patients with mantle cell lymphoma

High relapse rates after standard-of-care regimens in the frontline setting are typical of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), which is an aggressive, rare, B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The second-generation, highly selective BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib has been approved in the US for the treatment of patients with MCL after ≥ 1 prior therapy based on the single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II ACE-LY-004 study.

Approaching marginal zone lymphoma from various angles

Approximately 10 % of Non-Hodgkin lymphomas are classified as marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) [1]. This is a heterogeneous malignancy with three main subtypes (i.e., extranodal, nodal, splenic) arising from memory B cells in the marginal zone of secondary lymphoid follicles [2, 3]. Due to its rarity and heterogeneous nature, the optimal therapeutic strategies for patients with MZL have been difficult to define.

Insights from early clinical trials on targeted treatment in B-cell malignancies

Richter’s transformation (RT), which describes transformation of CLL/SLL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or Hodgkin lymphoma, is a rare event occurring in approximately 5–7 % of CLL cases [1]. However, defined standards of care are lacking, and outcomes are generally poor once patients are refractory to rituximab plus chemotherapy.

Management of CLL patients: BTK inhibition and beyond

BTK inhibitors, the Bcl-2 inhibitor venetoclax and anti-CD20 antibodies such as obinutuzumab have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL). Ibrutinib, as the first-generation representative of the BTK inhibitor class, is a therapeutic mainstay, although it has notable shortcomings that led to the introduction of second-generation agents.