PFS improvement due to local therapy in oligometastatic NSCLC
Evidence suggests the existence of a ,limited metastatic’ NSCLC phenotype. However, the type of optimal treatment and the role of aggressive local therapy in these patients remain controversial. Gomez et al. presented the first prospective, randomised trial to address this question. Patients had stage IV disease without RECIST progression and a maximum of three metastases after front-line systemic therapy (FLST). Malignant pleural effusion was an exclusion criterion. FLST was defined as ≥ 4 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy, ≥ 3 months of erlotinib, afatinib, or gefitinib therapy in case of EGFR mutation, or ≥ 3 months of crizotinib therapy for those with EML4-ALK fusion. The patients were randomised to either local consolidative therapy (LCT; surgery ± radiation to primary and metastases followed by standard maintenance or surveillance according to the physician’s choice) or no LCT (standard maintenance or surveillance according to the physician’s choice). PFS was defined as the primary outcome. Twenty-four patients were evaluable in each group.
Patients treated with LCT fared significantly better than the no-LCT group. Median PFS was 11.9 vs. 3.9 months, respectively (p = 0.005). At the same time, toxicity did not differ substantially. There were differences in patterns of failure that trended towards significance (p = 0.09) (Figure). Patients in the no-LCT arm experienced a comparatively higher proportion of locoregional-only and known (vs. new-site) failures, whereas those in the LCT arm showed comparatively higher percentages of metastatic-only and new failures. Both locoregional and metastatic failures were more common in the no-LCT Arm (29 % vs. 8 %). The time to new-site failure significantly favoured LCT (11.9 vs. 5.7 months; p = 0.0497), which suggests reductions in the metastatic spread.
Figure: Differences in the patterns of failure by treatment arm (local consolidative therapy or no local consolidative therapy)
In the entire cohort, two other factors associated with PFS were identified: patients with two to three metastases after FLST had worse outcomes than those with only one lesion (p = 0.043), as did those without EGFR/ ALK alterations as compared to patients who were either EGFR-positive or ALK-positive (p = 0.035). Median OS was not reached in either arm. As the data are not yet mature, patients continue to be followed for this endpoint.
REFERENCES
- Gomez D et al., Local consolidative therapy (LCT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who do not progress after front line systemic therapy (FLST): results of a multiinstitutional phase II randomized study. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 (suppl; abstr 9004)
More posts
Exploring established and novel EGFR-directed agents
The phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial was a head-to-head comparison of the second- generation ErbB family blocker afatinib and the first-generation reversible EGFR TKI gefitinib in patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutation-positive, advanced (stage IIIB/IV) adenocarcinoma of the lung.According to the primary analysis, patients treated with afatinib derived significant PFS, ORR and time-to-treatment-failure benefits compared to those who received gefitinib.
Lung cancer care in Latin America: evolution of modern therapies and challenges to overcome the existing gaps
It is important to understand that Latin America is a large continent with approximately 600 million inhabitants. The four most-populated cities are Mexico City, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Buenos Aires, where the number of people living in just these four cities is equal to the total number of inhabitants of France.
Expanding treatment options in NSCLC patients with rare mutations: ALK, ROS1, MET, BRAF
ALK gene rearrangements occur in approximately 4 %to 5 % of all Caucasian and Asian patients with advanced NSCLC. Crizotinib was the first approved ALK inhibitor and is the current front-line standard treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. However, despite initial responses to TKI treatment, all of these patients relapse in the long run.
Immunotherapy: updates on clinical trials and other insights
Besides targeted drugs for driver mutations, immunotherapies represent one of the two recent major advancements of the past decade for the treatment of metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nivolumab and ipilimumab enhance T-cell antitumour activity through distinct and complementary mechanisms.
Preface – ASCO 2016
Lung cancer mortality rates for both men and women have been declining in recent years. Early detection, refined understanding of tumour biology, and a variety of novel treatment options have made these advances possible. Nevertheless, lung cancer is still the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide, prompting the scientific community to persevere in their research efforts and to extend them to areas that have traditionally been marked by little progress, such as small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
